+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 30.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B was created through distillation into an ultra-compact Qwen architecture, designed to enable reasoning capabilities on resource-constrained devices. Built with just 1.5 billion parameters, it brings advanced analytical techniques to edge computing and mobile scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
3 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:34.5%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:65.0%(+30.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:34.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:65.0%(+30.5%)
Providers:0