+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 53.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (83.9%), AIME 2024 (52.7%), GPQA (33.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:15.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:68.9%(+53.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:15.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:68.9%(+53.3%)
Providers:0