+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads with 14.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B was created through distillation into an ultra-compact Qwen architecture, designed to enable reasoning capabilities on resource-constrained devices. Built with just 1.5 billion parameters, it brings advanced analytical techniques to edge computing and mobile scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:16.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:31.4%(+14.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:16.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:31.4%(+14.5%)
Providers:4