+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 12.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (93.9%), AIME 2024 (80.0%), GPQA (59.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 days newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:57.2%(+12.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:44.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:57.2%(+12.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:44.6%
Providers:0