+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 6.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B was developed as a mid-sized distilled variant based on Qwen, designed to balance reasoning capability with practical deployment considerations. Built to provide strong analytical performance while remaining accessible, it serves applications requiring reliable reasoning without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
4 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:56.1%(+6.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:49.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:56.1%(+6.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:49.2%
Providers:1