+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 37.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B was developed as a mid-sized distilled variant based on Qwen, designed to balance reasoning capability with practical deployment considerations. Built to provide strong analytical performance while remaining accessible, it serves applications requiring reliable reasoning without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
5 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:56.1%(+37.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:19.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:56.1%(+37.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:19.0%
Providers:0