+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 37.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B was developed as a mid-sized distilled variant based on Qwen, designed to balance reasoning capability with practical deployment considerations. Built to provide strong analytical performance while remaining accessible, it serves applications requiring reliable reasoning without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
5 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:56.1%(+37.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:18.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:56.1%(+37.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:18.4%
Providers:1