+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs GLM-4.6
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.6 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (93.9%), AIME 2024 (80.0%), GPQA (59.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 is a multimodal language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (93.9%), LiveCodeBench v6 (82.8%), GPQA (81.0%). It supports a 197K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:28.6%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:42.9%(+14.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:28.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:42.9%(+14.2%)
Providers:2