+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 29.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B was developed as a mid-sized distilled variant based on Qwen, designed to balance reasoning capability with practical deployment considerations. Built to provide strong analytical performance while remaining accessible, it serves applications requiring reliable reasoning without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
2 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:69.5%(+29.7%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:39.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:69.5%(+29.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:39.8%
Providers:1