+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 30.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (93.9%), AIME 2024 (80.0%), GPQA (59.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:15.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:46.3%(+30.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:15.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:46.3%(+30.4%)
Providers:1