+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 26.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B was developed as a mid-sized distilled variant based on Qwen, designed to balance reasoning capability with practical deployment considerations. Built to provide strong analytical performance while remaining accessible, it serves applications requiring reliable reasoning without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:59.1%(+26.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:59.1%(+26.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1