+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Nova Pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Pro leads with 56.3% higher average benchmark score. Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nova Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (93.9%), AIME 2024 (80.0%), GPQA (59.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Nova Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Amazon. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.2% across 27 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (94.8%), GSM8k (94.8%), DocVQA (93.5%). It supports a 600K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Amazon's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Nova Pro
Amazon
2024-11-20
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:9.5%
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Average Score:65.9%(+56.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
1 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:9.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Avg Score:65.9%(+56.3%)
Providers:1