+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (93.9%), AIME 2024 (80.0%), GPQA (59.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:57.2%(+16.4%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:40.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:57.2%(+16.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:40.8%
Providers:0