+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads with 13.1% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B was developed as a mid-sized distilled variant based on Qwen, designed to balance reasoning capability with practical deployment considerations. Built to provide strong analytical performance while remaining accessible, it serves applications requiring reliable reasoning without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
1 month newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Average Score:59.1%(+13.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:46.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Avg Score:59.1%(+13.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:46.0%
Providers:0