+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek-R1-0528
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 14.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-R1-0528 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $2.35 cheaper per million tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
4 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($2.35 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:67.5%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:81.9%(+14.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:67.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:81.9%(+14.4%)
Providers:3