+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek-V3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 17.7% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $1.07 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
26 days newer
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($1.07 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:74.2%(+17.7%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:56.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:74.2%(+17.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:56.5%
Providers:1