Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 52.3% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $1.07 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.2% across 20 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DROP (91.6%), CLUEWSC (90.9%), MATH-500 (90.2%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
26 days newer
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek-V3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek-V3
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek