Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 12.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $2.50 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval