+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 40.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
5 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:59.7%(+40.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:19.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:59.7%(+40.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:19.0%
Providers:0