Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 42.8% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $1.70 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.5
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra
GLM-4.5
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.5
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.5
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval