+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 39.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:21.2%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:60.8%(+39.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:21.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:60.8%(+39.6%)
Providers:0