Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 13.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B offers 59.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $2.30 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 is a multimodal language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (93.9%), LiveCodeBench v6 (82.8%), GPQA (81.0%). It supports a 197K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.6
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.6
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra
GLM-4.6
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.6
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GLM-4.6
DeepInfra
ZeroEval