+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 31.1% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $12.20 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
5 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($12.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:72.7%(+31.1%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:41.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:72.7%(+31.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:41.6%
Providers:2