+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-5 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 nano offers 272.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. Both models have similar pricing. GPT-5 nano supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-5 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
6 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($0.15 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:62.1%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:71.2%(+9.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:62.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:71.2%(+9.1%)
Providers:2