Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 13.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. Both models have similar pricing. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra
GPT OSS 120B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval