+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT OSS 120B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 18.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. Both models have similar pricing. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
6 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($0.24 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:62.1%
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:80.1%(+18.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:62.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:80.1%(+18.0%)
Providers:5