+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 19.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B offers 120.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
28 days newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($0.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:67.5%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:86.7%(+19.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:67.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:86.7%(+19.2%)
Providers:1