Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 16.1% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Grok-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Grok-4
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra
Grok-4
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Grok-4
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Grok-4
xAI
ZeroEval