+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 15.4% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($0.45 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:62.1%(+15.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:46.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:62.1%(+15.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:46.7%
Providers:5