+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Nova Micro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Micro leads with 42.1% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Nova Micro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Nova Micro is a language model developed by Amazon. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.0% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (92.3%), ARC-C (90.2%), Translation Set1→en COMET22 (88.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Amazon's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Nova Micro
Amazon
2024-11-20
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Input:$0.03
Output:$0.14($0.13 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:14.8%
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Average Score:57.0%(+42.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:14.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Micro
Avg Score:57.0%(+42.1%)
Providers:1