+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 3.5% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $74.70 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
1 month newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18($74.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:72.7%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:76.2%(+3.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
o1
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:72.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:76.2%(+3.5%)
Providers:2