Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 50.6% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $74.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
o1
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra
o1
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
o1
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
o1
Azure
OpenAI