+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 2.6% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
3 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:67.5%(+2.6%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:65.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:67.5%(+2.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:65.0%
Providers:0