+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads with 25.8% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input:$0.12
Output:$0.18
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($0.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Average Score:57.2%(+25.8%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:31.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Avg Score:57.2%(+25.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:31.4%
Providers:4