+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 19.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Gemini 2.5 Flash is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B was developed as a compact distilled model, designed to provide reasoning capabilities in an efficient 7B parameter package. Built to extend analytical AI to a broad range of applications, it balances capability with the practical benefits of a smaller model size.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Average Score:66.2%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:85.4%(+19.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Avg Score:66.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:85.4%(+19.2%)
Providers:2