+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1 vs GLM-4.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 is $0.74 cheaper per million tokens. DeepSeek-R1 is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Input:$0.55
Output:$2.19
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60($0.74 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Average Score:0.0%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:64.0%(+64.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
5 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 0.9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 2.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Together
Throughput: 4 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:64.0%(+64.0%)
Providers:3