+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $2.71 cheaper per million tokens. DeepSeek-R1 is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1 was developed as a reasoning-focused language model, designed to combine chain-of-thought reasoning with reinforcement learning techniques. Built to excel at complex problem-solving through trial-and-error learning and deliberate analytical processes, it demonstrates the power of efficient training methods in open-source model development.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Input:$0.55
Output:$2.19
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($2.71 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
5 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 0.9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 2.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Together
Throughput: 4 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1