+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $2.34 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Input:$0.55
Output:$2.19
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($2.34 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Average Score:0.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:79.9%(+79.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
5 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 0.9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 2.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Together
Throughput: 4 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:79.9%(+79.9%)
Providers:9