+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Zero leads with 6.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Zero is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was introduced as an experimental variant trained with minimal human supervision, designed to develop reasoning patterns through self-guided reinforcement learning. Built to explore how models can discover analytical strategies independently, it represents research into autonomous reasoning capability development.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
1 days newer
DeepSeek R1 Zero
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Average Score:80.0%(+6.3%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:73.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Avg Score:80.0%(+6.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:73.8%
Providers:0