+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Zero leads with 43.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Zero is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was introduced as an experimental variant trained with minimal human supervision, designed to develop reasoning patterns through self-guided reinforcement learning. Built to explore how models can discover analytical strategies independently, it represents research into autonomous reasoning capability development.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
5 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Zero
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Average Score:61.7%(+43.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:18.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Avg Score:61.7%(+43.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:18.4%
Providers:1