+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Zero leads with 9.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Zero is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was introduced as an experimental variant trained with minimal human supervision, designed to develop reasoning patterns through self-guided reinforcement learning. Built to explore how models can discover analytical strategies independently, it represents research into autonomous reasoning capability development.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
1 month newer
DeepSeek R1 Zero
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Average Score:84.6%(+9.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:74.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Avg Score:84.6%(+9.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:74.8%
Providers:0