+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Zero leads with 40.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Zero is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was introduced as an experimental variant trained with minimal human supervision, designed to develop reasoning patterns through self-guided reinforcement learning. Built to explore how models can discover analytical strategies independently, it represents research into autonomous reasoning capability development.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek R1 Zero
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Average Score:73.3%(+40.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Avg Score:73.3%(+40.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1