+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 24.0% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V2.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V2.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
1 month newer
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:84.8%(+24.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:60.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 63 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:84.8%(+24.0%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0