+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 1.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 245.8K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V2.5 is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
10 months newer
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input:$0.14
Output:$0.28
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.27 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:86.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:87.9%(+1.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 63 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:86.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:87.9%(+1.6%)
Providers:1