+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V2.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V2.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.1% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.1%), MT-Bench (90.2%), HumanEval (89.0%). The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:41.0%(+13.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:27.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 63 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:41.0%(+13.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:27.3%
Providers:0