Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 14.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed offers 47.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $59.58 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-V2.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V2.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
1 year newer

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)

DeepSeek-V2.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

DeepSeek-V2.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic

DeepSeek-V2.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

DeepSeek-V2.5

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together