+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V2.5 vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 10.9% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o offers 128.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $12.08 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
3 months newer
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input:$0.14
Output:$0.28($12.08 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:48.6%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:59.5%(+10.9%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Coding16.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Coding33.2%(+16.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 63 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:48.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:59.5%(+10.9%)
Providers:2