+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 28.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V2.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V2.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.1% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.1%), MT-Bench (90.2%), HumanEval (89.0%). The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Average Score:50.8%(+28.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:22.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 63 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V2.5
Avg Score:50.8%(+28.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:22.6%
Providers:0