Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V2.5 leads with 15.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct offers 239.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V2.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
4 months newer

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

DeepSeek-V2.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

DeepSeek-V2.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic

DeepSeek-V2.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

DeepSeek-V2.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together