+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 15.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.4% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.0%), MMLU-Pro (81.2%), GPQA (68.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 days newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek
2025-03-25
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Average Score:35.2%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:50.5%(+15.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Avg Score:35.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:50.5%(+15.3%)
Providers:0