+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 0324 leads with 35.6% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3 0324 offers 71.7K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $1.39 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3-0324 represents a specific release iteration of DeepSeek-V3, developed to incorporate ongoing improvements and refinements. Built to provide enhanced stability and performance based on deployment learnings, it continues the evolution of the DeepSeek-V3 architecture with iterative enhancements.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
6 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek
2025-03-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input:$0.28
Output:$1.14
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($1.39 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Average Score:68.4%(+35.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Avg Score:68.4%(+35.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1