Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3. DeepSeek-V3 is $1.43 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer

DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

DeepSeek-V3

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

DeepSeek-V3

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek-V3

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek-V3

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval