+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.2% across 20 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DROP (91.6%), CLUEWSC (90.9%), MATH-500 (90.2%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 35 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:38.4%(+6.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:31.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
1 providers
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:38.4%(+6.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:31.6%
Providers:0