+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3 leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B is $1.07 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
2 months newer
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.10
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($1.07 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Average Score:56.7%(+8.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:48.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
1 providers
DeepSeek
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3
Avg Score:56.7%(+8.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:2